Article Sidebar

Submitted
May 13, 2022
Published
February 28, 2024
Download
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 134 Download : 78

Main Article Content

Abstract

In South Africa, residual granite is associated with the collapse phenomenon, a geotechnical hazard that was first identified in the 1950s. Residual granite is a product of chemical weathering (in-situ decomposition) or physical weathering of the parent rock (granite) whilst reworked residual granites is defined as residual granite reworked in-situ by termites. Residual granite usually consists of bulky-sized quartz particles, with silts, and bridged by colloidal matter. Extreme leaching of the colloidal matter creates a structure like a honeycomb. It, however, leaves voids within the structure, which affects the mechanical behaviour of the soil. The soil collapses upon wetting under additional loading.  Construction on soils with a collapsible fabric has led to many documented problems. This paper, therefore, reports on the examination of mineral composition and particle shape examination and its effect on behavioural changes of potentially collapsible soil. The soil used for this study includes reworked residual granite obtained from the Stellenbosch area in the Western Cape of South Africa. A multi-element analysis and morphological studies were performed on mounts using the ZEISS EVO MA15 scanning electron microscope at the Centre for Analytical Facility at Stellenbosch University. Shape analysis confirmed that the severity of collapse increased with increasing angularity. In addition, the type and amount of clay present at particle contacts influenced the swell and collapse behaviour of reworked residual granite.

Keywords

Reworked Residual Granite Scanning Electron Microscope Image Analysis Particle Shape Mineral Composition

Article Details

References

  1. American Society for Testing and Materials (2012). Annual book of ASTM standards – ASTM D421/422 – dry preparation of soil samples for particle-size analysis and determination of soil constants/particle-size analysis of soil, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA
  2. Asante, S. Y. (2015). Alternate methods to determine the microstructure of potentially collapsible soils, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa, available online at www.sunscholar.sun.ac.za. (assessed online: April 10, 2022)
  3. Ashmawy, A. (2003). Evaluating the influence of particle shape on liquefaction behaviour using discrete element modelling. Proceedings of Offshore and Polar, pp. 1–8. Retrieved from http://e-book.lib.sjtu.edu.cn/isope2003/pdffiles/volume2/2079p542.pdf.
  4. Basma, A. A and Tuncer, E. R. (1992). Evaluation and control of collapsible soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 118 (10), pp. 1491-1504. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1992)118:10(1491)
  5. Brink, A.B.A. (1981). Engineering geology of Southern Africa: Volume 2. South Africa: Building Publications.
  6. Brink, A.B.A., Partridge, T.C. and Williams, A.A.B. (1982). Soil survey for engineering. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  7. Cho, G.C., Dodds, J. & Santamarina, J.C. (2006) Particle shape effect on packing density, stiffness, and strength: Natural and crushed sands. Journal of American Society of Civil Engineers, 132, pp. 591-602. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:5(591)
  8. Dippenaar, M., Van Rooy, L. and Croukamp, L. (2006). The use of index laboratory testing to determine the engineering behaviour of granitic saprolite. Proc.: International Association of Engineering and Environmental Geologists. 466, pp. 1-4.
  9. Fouche, N and Asante, S Y. (2019). The collapsible nature of residual granite soils of the Cape Granite Suite. J. S. Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng. 61, pp. 57-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2019/v61n2a6
  10. Gildenhuys N, (2010). The occurrence and extent of collapse settlement in residual granite in the Stellenbosch area. MSc. Eng. Thesis, University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
  11. Koerner, R.M. (1984). Construction and geotechnical methods in foundation engineering. USA: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
  12. Krumbein, W.C. (1941). Measurement and geological significance of shape and roundness of sedimentary particles. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 11(2), pp. 64 -72. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:129176838
  13. Leygonie, F.E. (1977). Die graniete van Langebaan, Kaapprovinsie. Annals University of Stellenbosch. A1(2), pp. 33-105.
  14. Mong, D. (2022). The disintegration characteristics of residual granite soil. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Engineering (meng) at the University of Stellenbosch, South Africa. https://scholar.sun.ac.za (assessed online: November 15, 2023)
  15. Paige-Green, P. (2008). Dealing with road subgrade problems in Southern Africa. 12th International Conference on Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics.
  16. Rodriguez, J. (2013). Importance of the particle shape on mechanical properties of soil materials (Licentiate dissertation, Luleå tekniska universitet). Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-26434
  17. Santamarina, J.C. and Cho, G.C. (2004). Soil Behaviour: The role of particle shape. Proc. Skempton Conf., March, London. pp. 604-617. https://doi.org/10.1061/40659(2003)2
  18. Schwartz, K. (1985). Problem soils in South Africa - state of the art: collapsible soils. The Civil Engineer in South Africa, 27 (7), pp.379-393. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC24997
  19. Smalley, I. (1992), The Teton Dam: rhyolite foundation loess core disaster. Geology Today, 8, pp. 19-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2451.1992.tb00347.x
  20. Stapelberg, F. D. J. (2021). Case study in The Northern Cape (Loopeng Area), South Africa, confirming occurrence of a collapsible soil structure in transported soils. [https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-317200/v1
  21. Sun, P. P., Zhang M. S., & Zhu, L. F. (2013). Typical case study of loess collapse and discussion on related problems. Geological Bulletin of China. 32(6): pp. 847-851 (in Chinese). http://dzhtb.cgs.cn/en/article/id/20130604
  22. Terblanche E.H. (1989). Settlement and underpinning of a building founded on residual granite. A case history. The civil engineer in South Africa. 31(3), pp. 77-80,99. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/AJA10212019_18969